Which review type uses detailed criteria to grade writing samples?

The analytical review is characterized by its use of detailed criteria to assess and grade writing samples. This type of review often breaks down the components of writing, such as organization, content, style, grammar, and mechanics, allowing for a thorough evaluation of each element. The detailed criteria used in this approach provide a clear framework for both evaluators and writers, ensuring that feedback is specific and constructive. This is particularly beneficial in educational settings where specific aspects of writing need to be highlighted for student improvement.

In contrast, the comprehensive assessment generally encompasses a broader evaluation that may not focus strictly on detailed criteria for each writing sample. Summative evaluation primarily measures student learning at the end of an instructional unit, often summarizing overall performance rather than analyzing specific writing elements in depth. Descriptive review focuses on describing qualities or aspects of the work without necessarily applying specific grading criteria, making it less structured compared to an analytical review. Thus, the analytical review stands out as the type that systematically utilizes detailed benchmarks for grading and improving writing.