What type of review is used to assess writing samples for scoring?

The correct choice emphasizes the analytical approach that focuses on breaking down a writing sample into its individual components to assess specific characteristics such as structure, grammar, style, and content. This type of review allows evaluators to provide targeted feedback on each element of the writing, which can give a more detailed understanding of a writer's strengths and weaknesses.

Analytical reviews are particularly useful in educational contexts where educators aim to provide comprehensive feedback to improve a student’s writing skills. They involve criteria-based assessments that dissect the writing into categories, enabling a precise scoring methodology that reflects the various aspects of the writing piece.

In contrast, other approaches like peer review involve evaluations by fellow students, which can be subjective and vary widely based on the peer's own skill level and understanding. Holistic evaluation might consider the overall effectiveness of the writing without focusing on individual components, potentially missing specific areas of improvement. Formative assessment focuses broadly on ongoing evaluations during the learning process rather than specific writing samples aimed at scoring.